» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

jacobvandy (1233)    Jan 08, 2010 - 12:59 pm | Edited on Jan 08, 2010 - 01:03 pm

i don't know exactly why you're so upset, there is no bias here. if a game isn't on the list but should have been, that means i just haven't heard about it. STALKER: Call of Pripyat is on the list, i am very much looking forward to playing it. and see Metro 2033, a game i think could be really interesting from a startup in Ukraine... i liked the witcher, but am unaware of a sequel. are you sure it's meant to come out this year? i had no idea about fallout: new vegas! i might've read a news story but then glossed over it thinking it was yet another fallout 3 DLC, lol. since they have no release date beyond "2010" i wouldn't be surprised if it's delayed, but it certainly could have been put on the last page with the other maybes. it's being published by bethesda though, a very american company. p.s. you can turn off the profanity filter in your account options. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

jacobvandy (1233)    Jan 01, 2010 - 03:06 pm

you should, because it's not going to be out before 2011. » Login to reply to this  LinxIB (8)   Jan 02, 2010 - 06:41 am 2011?? You're kiddin right m8? I know we're talking 'no deadlines-Blizzard' here, but the game was scheduled for a late '09 release. More than a year delay seems a bit steep don't you think? » Login to reply to this  Labotomizer (1297)    Jan 03, 2010 - 09:45 pm Not questioning the addictiveness of Diablo, however WoW is a "full time" MMO. Diablo boils down to one thing - combat. WoW is a little more, including crafting and gathering. Just slightly different. Maybe people won't play wow as much for a few months, but still don't think they'll cancel subs. » Login to reply to this  jacobvandy (1233)    Jan 02, 2010 - 03:11 pm it wasn't scheduled for anything, only announced. i saw a photo from blizz-con that showed the planned releases for the next few years, and it was SC2 one year, diablo 3 the next, then some WOW expansion, etc. if i come upon it again, i will post a link, but here's one of the many articles quoting an executive saying it won't be out next year. Link: http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11......en-itll-be-rel/ » Login to reply to this  Knuckles (1418)    Jan 02, 2010 - 12:41 pm @Labotomizer Maybe you are right about battle.net, but when I played Diablo 2 one summer (many years ago) I got addicted in doing boss runs so I know how addicting Diablo can be, however I haven't played MMOs (for that reason) so I don't know if they are as addictive or even more so. But I have a feeling that is the same thing and if so then I think people might switch over. » Login to reply to this  Labotomizer (1297)    Jan 02, 2010 - 09:08 am @knuckles - I believe moving WoW subs to Battle.net was to prep people for paying a sub for Diablo 3. They'll likely offer something like $20-25/month for all 3 games, D3, SC2 and WoW. Plus, I don't see a game like Diablo really cutting into WoW's numbers. Sure many who play wow might play diablo but that doesn't mean they'll be willing to give up a "full time" mmo for a regular online game. » Login to reply to this  Knuckles (1418)    Jan 02, 2010 - 08:03 am Why would they come out with a game that could possibly put a dent in there WOW subscription base, unless they are working on similar business model and that was causing the delay. I think we won't see Diablo 3 until wow becomes less popular. » Login to reply to this

» Note: You need to be logged in to write a comment!